pad

Therapy Rethought: Chemo

October 2007 from the Susan G. Komen for the Cure enewsletter:

Taxol® Benefits May Be Limited to HER2-positive and/or ER Negative Breast Cancer

October 11, 2007 - In a study conducted by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B, chemotherapy with paclitaxel (Taxol) was significantly more beneficial in women with HER2-positive and/or ER negative breast cancer following treatment with doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide than in women whose breast cancers were both ER positive and HER2-negative.

Treatment with many chemotherapy drugs is often accompanied by undesirable side-effects. With Taxol potential side effects include nerve damage. Understanding which patients will benefit from these drugs and not giving them to those who don’t benefit is a goal in current research. Research news such as this is promising because it helps identify the patients who are most likely to benefit from the additional chemotherapy and avoid many side-effects of current treatment strategies for those who don’t benefit.

Authors of a recent study in the New England Journal of Medicine, "HER2 and Response to Paclitaxel in Node-Positive Breast Cancer," caution that their findings should not immediately change the way oncologists approach treatment. Importantly, other studies have shown that taxanes can be beneficial in women with ER positive and HER2 negative breast cancer. Moreover, there are newer and more effective ways of administering Taxol. Nevertheless, these results are part of a framework of studies suggesting that the benefits of chemotherapy vary according to the breast cancer subtype.

Komen’s Chief Scientific Advisor, Dr. Eric P. Winer, who was also an author on the study, commented: “We are learning more about which patients get the most benefit from treatments like chemotherapy. Increasingly, we are abandoning the view that a one size fits all approach works for women with breast cancer. In the years ahead, we anticipate ever greater individualization of treatment. For some women, that will mean skipping treatments like chemotherapy. For other patients, it may mean using chemotherapy even in the setting of very early stage breast cancer.”



For lots more information on chemotherapy, you can go to Studies section (left side of every page)-Conventional Therapy.

Demonstrating that it takes FOREVER for a new idea to work its way through the system - you can find below a May 12, 2006 New York Times article on "Shift in Treating Breast Cancer Is Under Debate". This article predicts it will take at least a decade to have consensus on this issue.

The Best Treatment for Breast Cancer?

Jan. 4, 2002 (Ivanhoe Newswire) -- New research suggests breast cancer patients with tumors less than a centimeter in size may be better off in the end if they forego treatment with chemotherapy and/or tamoxifen after their surgery.

Doctors know women with larger tumors benefit from additional, or adjuvant, therapy after initial treatment for their cancers. However, they are not sure whether women with very small tumors really need this treatment, since the risk of recurrence for them is so low.

In this study, investigators from UCLA found the risk of a long-term decline in physical functioning caused by the treatments outweighed any benefits of the additional therapy among women with very small tumors.

The study involved about 760 women who were an average of 6.3 years past their initial diagnosis of cancer and who had remained disease-free. Each filled out an extensive questionnaire on quality of life issues ranging from physical and social functioning to sexual desire and body image.

Results show breast cancer survivors report an excellent quality of life overall. However, when researchers compared results for women with very small tumors who had received additional treatment with chemotherapy and/or tamoxifen to those who had not received additional treatment, they found those who received additional therapy scored lower on physical functioning measures.

Patricia Ganz, M.D., from UCLA, is quoted as saying, "The question has been asked: Should every woman, even those with very small tumors, receive chemotherapy or tamoxifen or both after surgery? I think, in light of this research, the answer may be no.

This study shows there are some subtle costs to be paid with adjuvant therapy. But the only place this would carry any weight would be in women with tumors less than a centimeter in size."

SOURCE: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2002;94:39-49


pad
padSmall Breast Tumors May Not Need Chemo
pad
As reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Conference, 12/99
pad
pad
padSystemic Overview of Chemo Effects
pad
Acta Oncologica (Sweden), 8/01
pad
Anemia in Breast Ca Pts Before/After Chemo
pad
pad
padTesting if Chemo is Needed
pad
Europe is using uPA and PAI
pad
Survival/Tumor:Drug Resistance Assay
Genetic Test May Spare Chemo Use
pad
padScintigraphic Imaging & Chemo Response
pad
J Nuclear Medicien, 6/02
pad
pad
pad
padEstimate: 1-20 out of 100 Benefit w/Chemo
pad
Boston Globe, 4/8/03
pad
P53 Resistance to Paclitaxel
Synergistic Effects: Grape Seed Extract & Doxorubicin
pad
padLess Chemo Given to African-American Women
pad
Breast Ca Res Treat, 9/03
pad
pad
pad
padPreop Chemo: NO SURVIVAL Advantage
pad
Editorial JCO, 12/03
pad
pad
padHigher Levels of uPA/PAI-1 Predicts Better Response to Chemo
pad
Cancer Res, 1/04
pad
pad
pad
padNo Clinical Impact to Reductions in Adjv Chemo: BCa
pad
Abstract # 552 ASCO, 2004
pad
MRI Identifies Responders w/Vascular Imaging:BCa
pad
pad"Shift in Treating Breast Cancer is Under Debate"
pad
New York Times, May 12, 2006
pad
pad

Remember we are NOT Doctors and have NO medical training.

This site is like an Encylopedia - there are many pages, many links on many topics.

Support our work with any size DONATION - see left side of any page - for how to donate. You can help raise awareness of CAM.